Simplify, Simplify

English teacher, Shakespeare admirer, vocabulary investigator, photographer, writer, reader, nerdfighter, wifey, doggy momma, daughter, friend, Family Guy fan, journalist, cheese lover. Also, I love Dave Matthews Band more than I love most things and people.

tumblinks

search

powered by tumblr
seattle theme by parker ehret

  1. My dear friend and fellow book geek wrote this review about “Little Brother” by Cory Doctorow. We were chatting about it the other day, so I’ve been meaning to read and share her review. I read it last month and more or less forced her to read it, and I was so glad she enjoyed it as much as I did. 

    Click through to read the basic summary and important points, then come back because there are a couple of things I want to add. Go ahead. I’ll wait.

    *taps foot* *checks watch*

    OK, so now that you have the gist of this badass teen dystopian world created by a huge techno geek (yeah, if you DIDN’T click through you really want to NOW, don’t you?! Do it.), there are a few things I want to say about the book.

    1. I agree that the gap between good and evil is a big one, but toward the end, our main character realizes that he needs help, and one particular adult makes his revolution possible. I point this out because she was probably my favorite character. She’s a female journalist who listens to his story, and instead of just believing everything he says and publishing it (which is what most readers unfamiliar with the world of journalism would expect), she tells him she will VERIFY everything before she publishes (which is what journalists DO). I love that. And I love her character.

    2. The techno jargon was almost too much for me. The author has the narrator explain some of the technology he uses to get around the ridiculous surveillance at his school, for example, or how he gets around some of the Department of Homeland Security spies and whatnot. Some of the explanations are brief and satisfying to someone like me who cares far more about the plot than the technology, but other explanations are LONG and (for someone like me) confusing and unnecessary. However, I realize the author had to include them to appease the techno pros who would poke holes in the plot based on the technology. I still skipped several paragraphs just to get back to the plot, and almost put it down altogether because it was annoying and overwhelming.

    3. I love the main character. His main motivation to take on Homeland Security is that his friend who was stabbed in the initial action was never released from questioning even though he and his other two friends were. He has several moments of questioning if he is doing the right thing, and is urged on by people who have come to see him as a brave leader, even if he doesn’t feel that way himself. That dichotomy of who he is and how he is perceived in the online revolution that occurs is what drives his character development, and I loved it. He is a very unlikely hero, which makes his actions that much more heroic, in my opinion.

    I also have to add that he has a little romantic affair that is adorable and believable all at the same time, and I love that it wasn’t perfect and predictable, because relationships rarely are. That would be boring, wouldn’t it? 

     
     
  2. A couple days ago I posted my thoughts about a Wall Street Journal article that claimed contemporary young adult literature is too dark. This article does a great job explaining what the YA authors had to say in response to it.

     
     
  3. Why current literature for teens rocks, and why the Wall Street Journal is completely out of touch

    Confession: I joined Twitter a while ago because it was such a weird and awesome concept when it first started. I followed some friends and local people, but it was kind of boring after a while. While searching for new, interesting people to follow, I found a bunch of authors - specifically, young adult literature authors. Authors like Laurie Halse Anderson and Scott Westerfeld, both of whom I’d heard of before. I also came across Maureen Johnson, who is easily the most entertaining person I’ve ever followed on Twitter. EASILY. She’s funny, quirky, unpredictable, and has moved followers to raise THOUSANDS of dollars for Shelterbox, which provides shelters for people who have survived natural disasters (Japan earthquake and tsunami, Joplin tornadoes, etc.).

    Basically, these three, and a few others who I’ve gotten to know via Twitter, really piqued my interest in YA literature and I couldn’t be more grateful. YA books today are amazing. There were very few books aimed at teens when I was a teenager, which is why I rarely read anything not assigned to me by my English teachers. It sounds crazy since I’m an English teacher and bookworm now, but I went through a looooong period of never reading for fun because there were no books that interested me (or so I thought, really there was just no one to show me books I might like).

    Anyway. Yesterday, these and other authors and tons of YA readers lashed out on Twitter in response to this AWFUL book review by a writer at the Wall Street Journal. The article called “Darkness Too Visible” criticizes current YA books for being too gory, too dark, with no happy endings. The “writer” (I use that term loosely) says the descriptions of self-injury glorify the act and that the language in YA books is vulgar.  Obviously this writer has no idea that many teens don’t get happy endings for their adolescent years. They have filthy mouths because they’re trying to gain their independence and define themselves. Many teens ARE abused, molested, neglected, contemplate suicide, self-injure, and have NO OUTLET. No one to listen. No one who understands. Maybe not even a friend who listens.

    Read More

     
     
  4. Authors discuss why teens love dystopian stories

    The more time I spend in the classroom, the more I realize that teens today are fun, yet sophisticated. Fortunately for them, the current young adult authors know that, and write books accordingly. One of my favorite YA authors is Scott Westerfeld, and he recently wrote a bit about why he thinks teens love a good dystopian story. He joined a few other authors in the discussion, and the New York Times published it here.

    Scott Westerfeld believes teens have to answer to many demands, but aren’t given much freedom in return:

    Schools are places where teens are subject to dress codes, have few free speech rights, and are constantly surveilled, where they rise and sit at the sound of a bell. Is it any wonder that dystopian novels speak to them?

    Scott Westerfeld

    Westerfeld wrote an interesting sci-fi series that starts with Uglies, and he just completed another trilogy that starts with Leviathan. I read Uglies in college and loved it, and I just read Leviathan and can’t wait to read Bohemoth (the next one in the series).


    One of the other authors in the discussion is Paolo Bacigalupi who wrote The Windup Girl. I haven’t read it, but I loved what he had to say in his part of the discussion.

    I suspect that young adults crave stories of broken futures because they themselves are uneasily aware that their world is falling apart.

    Paolo Bacigalupi

    It’s a great discussion - check it out!